In honoring Martin Luther King, Jr.’s memory we also acknowledge non-violence as a truly powerful weapon to achieve equality and liberation, in fact, the only weapon that Christians who struggle for social change can claim as their own. The purpose of which, is to instill hope into those who are struggling financially or socially and in need. Chavez closes his speech by explaining a great example of nonviolent protesting, Mahatma Ghandi. The major section of the study will be a rhetorical analysis of the speech written by Cesar Chavez on the occasion of the end of his twenty-five-day fast, March 10, 1969. After Martin Luther King’s assassination, there were many people who wanted to fight back violently due to this misfortune. That speech contains primary examples of Chavez’s chief rhetorical skill, identification. The wrath of grapes was supposed to be a positive, nonviolent act. On this, Cesar Chavez wrote an article using many different rhetorical tools to state that nonviolence is better than violence. In the article, Cesar Chavez utilizes a variety of rhetorical strategies in order to achieve his purpose and solidify his argument that nonviolence is a powerful weapon. These tools include repetition, ethos/pathos/logos, and direct appeal to his audience. Cesar Chavez organized Hispanics in the United Farm Workers Association. Chavez antithetically arranges his arguments to prove the effectiveness of nonviolence. He warns that violence results in destruction and demoralization without bringing meaningful change, however, nonviolence attracts and retains the “support of millions…[even] against great odds”. Ten years subsequent to Martin Luther King Jr.’s assassination and in a form of honor, Cesar Chavez, a labor union organizer and civil rights leader, delivered his speech in 1978, “He Showed Us The Way,” in time where equality for African-Americans was overlooked. Some people did not take it that way. Cesar Chavez tries to persuade the people to help them to see that the only way to get meaningful and impactful change is through nonviolent actions. People thought as if nothing was wrong with the grapes and still continued to purchase them. (Lonestar College Library) So, we can note that the diverse social setting in which Chavez gave this speech was turbulent, people were desperate for reform, and individuals like Dr. King, Friedan, and Chavez were the face and voice of cultural communities striving for change. •Effectively identifies and analyzes Cesar Chavez’s rhetorical choices –striking diction, juxtaposition, and appeals to the reader’s fundamental moral beliefs –to argue that “nonviolence is the best and most moral way to bring change.” •Provides convincing evidence and analysis (e.g. Dr. King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings to bear in the real world. The first rhetorical tool that Chavez uses in his article is repetition. I am using that speech, therefore, as a paradigm and synthesis of his speaking. The rhetorical strategies of ethos, logos, and parallelism are important to his argument because … Cesar Chavez utilizes a few different rhetorical devices and writing methods when discussing the need for nonviolent protests in his movement for farm laborer’s justice. Cesar Chavez speech, the “Wrath of Grapes”, had a negative impact on people as well. Cesar Chavez admire prior activists’ non violence actions due to it attracting support from the people, and efficiently resolving the issue as one. “Chavez uses Gandhi, a … In the article “He Showed Us The Way,” civil rights leader and labor union organizer Cesar Chavez analyzes the struggle of his, as well as Martin Luther King Jr.’s cause, which is nonviolent protesting.
Polysporin Vs Neosporin Reddit, Lg 34um95-p Screen Replacement, Is Crow Poop Dangerous, Pokemon Radical Red Cheat Codes, How Long Do Cockatiel Eggs Take To Hatch, Beats Flex User Manual, Chinese Good Luck Housewarming Gifts, Gore Vidal Lincoln, Dragon Balls Inside Funko Pop Head, Skyscan Atomic Clocks With Indoor/outdoor Temperature,